Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Concurrence
I respectfully dissent from the principal and concurring opinions. Under the Constitution it is the exclusive function of the legislative branch of the government to make laws; ours is only to construe them. [1] If a statute be ambiguous it is our duty to say what it means, but where it is plain we are without constitutional authority to vary, enlarge or reduce it. Even where legislation is defective or obscure we cannot, under the guise of construction, go beyond the legislative intent in supplying or amending it; and that intention must be gathered primarily from the language used in the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Chandler v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Humes v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Grier v. Kansas City, Clay County & St. Joseph Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.