Legal Opinion

People v. Daugherty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest *1030of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his absence from two pretrial conferences deprived him of the right to be present at a material stage of the trial. Defendant concedes that the pretrial conferences were held to discuss a possible plea bargain, and thus his presence was not required (see, People v Harris, 222 AD2d 522, 523, lv denied 87 NY2d 1020, 88 NY2d 936; People v Woodrich, 212 AD2d 998, lv denied 85 NY2d 945; People v DeLong,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. DeLongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. WoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. FLOWERS, FRANK L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API