Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Remmert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 29, 1938No. 10611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The appellants, as the heirs at law of A. B. Stone, Sr., deceased, alleging themselves to be owners of an undivided one-third interest therein, and the appellees to be the owners of the remaining undivided two-thirds thereof, sued the latter for partition of a 419 by 160-foot tract of land out of the Stone, Sr., 200-acre homestead in the W. C. White league in Austin County, except such small part in the approximate center of this 419 by 160-foot parallelogram as had constituted “the present burying ground”, as set apart for that purpose by Stone, Sr., in paragraph “Fourthly”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Stephenson v. Miller-Link Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Stallings v. Federal Underwriters ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Warren v. Houston Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrus v. RemmertTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Andrus v. RemmertTexas Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API