Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 2013Published

1DissentStein, J.

Because I am of the view that the plain reading of CPL 440.46 renders defendant ineligible for resentencing, I respectfully dissent. As the majority notes, CPL 440.46 (5) expressly excludes from eligibility for resentencing “any person who is serving a sentence on a conviction for . . . an exclusion offense.” The issue before us is whether defendant is such a person. In making that determination, I begin with the definition of “exclusion offense” in CPL 440.46 (5), which includes, as relevant here, “any . . . offense for which a merit time allowance is not available pursuant to [Correction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API