Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 21, 2008No. 2007-1300Published

1DissentGajarsa, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s opinion. There is no legal basis for the granting of a preliminary injunction, and its issuance is an abuse of discretion. Although generally the denial or issuance of a preliminary injunction is within the broad discretion of the district court, the decision of the district court must be reversed when it abuses its discretion. See Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc., 138 F.3d 1448, 1460 (Fed.Cir.1998) (en banc) (“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on clearly erroneous findings of fact, is based on erroneous…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API