Legal Opinion

Raskin v. Town of Morristown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 21, 1956PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The basic issue here is the legal sufficiency of a local zoning regulation adopted June 14, 1954, by way of an amendment to the original ordinance, establishing an “Office Building District,” comprising two properties of plaintiffs, that is to say, a large dwelling house on the northwesterly corner of Hamilton Drive and South Street, in Morristown, hereafter to be referred to as “Dwelling House,” and a dwelling on the northeasterly corner of the same intersection, to be designated as “Apartment House,” and four adjacent parcels of land, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ward v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Hochberg v. Borough of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Sheerr v. Evesham Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Clary v. Borough of EatontownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Bogert v. Township of WashingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API