Legal Opinion

Van Duyn v. Van Duyn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1924No. 18371PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Van Duyn and wife, seek recovery of a claimed balance due them for their care and support of two children of their deceased son, Charles A. Van Duyn, for a period of several years next preceding his death. The action is upon a claim in that behalf presented to and rejected by Nela Smith Van Duyn, the widow of the deceased and administra-trix of his estate; the children being his children by a former wife. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Spokane county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding to the plaintiffs recovery for their care…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Prosser Falls Land & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Palmer Mountain Tunnel & Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sherwood Bros. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Poetz v. Sarah Mix & Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Robel v. Highline Public Schools, District No. 401Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Marriage of McLeanWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Donohoe v. ShearerWashington Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API