Legal Opinion
Polozie v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 4, 1993No. Civ. H-89-202 (JAC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This malpractice action was brought on April 5, 1989, against the government based on the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., for injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiff as a result of medical treatment she received from the United States Navy. Actions brought under the FTCA must be tried to the Court, and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to try the ease before a Magistrate Judge (filing # 77), electing to take any appeal in the case to the United States court of appeals. The case was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cooke v. ShapiroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- In re Tutu Water Wells Contamination Cercla LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999