80 Broad Street Co. v. United States Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour Schwartz, J.
Both parties move for summary judgment in this action where plaintiff, sublessee of 78-86 Broad Street, New York City, seeks to recover under its "Standard Multi-Peril Building Form Endorsement” of its fire insurance policy (all-risk) for loss sustained as a result of the buckling of the marble facing on its building constructed in 1931. On August 1, 1972, the City of New York placed a violation on the building and directed repair. The policy provides: "This policy insures against all risks of direct physical loss to coverage A-Buildings(S), subject to the provisions and stipulations herein…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Budd Looms, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kermani v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlbany City Court · 1932
3Cited by19 opinions
- Appalachian Insurance Company v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Mattis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Standard Structural Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Chadwick v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.