Legal Opinion

Aktiebolaget Malareprovinsernas Bank v. American Merchant Marine Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The plaintiff has recovered four judgments upon four marine insurance policies issued respectively by the American Merchant Marine Insurance Company, the Federal Insurance Company, the .¿Etna Insurance Company, and the National Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The four actions were tried together with five others before the court, without a jury. The policies covered the steamship Ada against war risks, and are substantially similar in' form. The issues in all the actions are the same, with the exception of the one against the National Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The policy in that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Johnson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  4. Burgess v. Equitable Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Bond v. The CoraU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1807

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Baker Castor Oil Co. v. Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  3. Aktiebolaget Malareprovinsernas Bank v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API