Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Clay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2007No. DA 06-0314PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 Carol Hagedorn (Carol), also known as Carol Konen, appeals from orders entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County, denying motions which sought to amend a parenting plan by changing residential custody, and awarding David Clay (David) costs and attorney fees. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 The restated issues on appeal are:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in determining the evidence was insufficient to establish a change in the children’s circumstances?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in awarding costs and attorney fees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. SwannMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of Whyte CouviMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Fink v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Parenting of A.M.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Parenting of L.R.Montana Supreme Court · 2023
  5. In Re the Marriage of ClayMontana Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API