Legal Opinion

In re Lane

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 15, 1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[In tlie matter of G. H. Lane, Brett & Co., and C. H. Boynton, bankrupts.]

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

1. The first question is, whether the joint creditors of the firm can have recourse to the separate estate of Lane for money drawn out by him while the firm was solvent, with the assent of his copartners. The general rule in bankruptcy is, that there can be no proof between the joint and separate estates of partners, unless there is a surplus of the joint estate to be divided. This rule was adopted partly as being, upon the whole, the most equitable, on the supposition that the joint creditors had given credit to the joint estate, and the separate creditors to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re TelferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. In re JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1900
  3. In re Boston & Fairhaven Iron-WorksDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API