Pahoulis v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This case involves the issue whether a community television antenna service is taxable as a “wire and equipment service” within the provisions of Section 3465(a) (2) (B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 3465(a) (2) (B).
The City of Meadville, Pennsylvania, is a relatively poor television reception area because of its geographical location in relation to the transmitting television stations and because the city lies almost entirely within a valley surrounded by high hills. To make available better television reception, Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sonzinsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Douglas v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Douglas v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Gust Pahoulis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Lilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956