Legal Opinion

Pahoulis v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1956No. Civ. No. 13696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

This case involves the issue whether a community television antenna service is taxable as a “wire and equipment service” within the provisions of Section 3465(a) (2) (B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 3465(a) (2) (B).

The City of Meadville, Pennsylvania, is a relatively poor television reception area because of its geographical location in relation to the transmitting television stations and because the city lies almost entirely within a valley surrounded by high hills. To make available better television reception, Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sonzinsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Douglas v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Douglas v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Gust Pahoulis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Lilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API