Legal Opinion

Preston v. Preston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1992No. S-89-1495PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

In this dissolution of marriage action, the respondent- appellant husband, Richard H. Preston, charges that the trial court erred in its (1) failure to cancel the judgment against him arising from the temporary allowance of child support to the petitioner-appellee wife, Sue E. Preston; (2) property and debt allocations; (3) award of alimony to the wife; and (4) award of an attorney fee to the wife. We affirm as modified.

II. FACTS

The issues presented by the assignments of error are such that a detailed summary of the record is necessary. The marriage took place on June 15,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ritter v. RitterNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Van Newkirk v. Van NewkirkNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stuhr v. StuhrNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Grace v. GraceNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Reichert v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jirkovsky v. JirkovskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tyler v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Priest v. PriestNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API