Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pallone

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-0896-CRPublished

1Dissent

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 85. (dissenting). In a refrain that has become all too familiar, the majority opinion dutifully repeats the principle that a "warrantless search is per se unreasonable unless one of the 'few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions' justifies the search,"1 and then proceeds to find yet another exception. I agree with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia that the warrant requirement "has become so riddled with exceptions that it [has become] basically unrecognizable."2 Because the majority opinion recognizes another exception to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API