State v. Pallone
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE
¶ 85. (dissenting). In a refrain that has become all too familiar, the majority opinion dutifully repeats the principle that a "warrantless search is per se unreasonable unless one of the 'few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions' justifies the search,"1 and then proceeds to find yet another exception. I agree with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia that the warrant requirement "has become so riddled with exceptions that it [has become] basically unrecognizable."2 Because the majority opinion recognizes another exception to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.