Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fabian F.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 6, 2013No. 11-P-1705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.

At issue is whether trial counsel was necessarily ineffective in 1988 (when the two-tiered juvenile trial system still existed2) for not claiming a de nova jury trial after a bench *395trial in which the juvenile had been adjudicated delinquent for rape of a child with force, G. L. c. 265, § 22A. Ruling on a motion for new trial filed twenty-two years later, a Juvenile Court judge concluded that the failure to claim a de nova trial, without more, constituted a form of per se ineffective assistance of counsel and allowed the juvenile’s motion. Mass.R.Crim.P. 30(c)(8), as appearing in 435 Mass.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SatterfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. WillieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlmonteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. Ricardo LopezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API