Legal Opinion

Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Niagara Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarsh, J.

The plaintiff, having commenced an action against the defendant City of Niagara Falls for a declaratory judgment that sections A-14 of chapter XLIX of the Niagara Falls City Ordinances, being the photographers’ ordinance, is arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and unconstitutional, and for an injunction against the enforcement of such ordinance, now seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining and enjoining the defendant from arresting or interfering with the plaintiff and its agents and employees for any violations of said ordinance in the conduct of plaintiff’s photographic business.

Cha…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People Ex Rel. Moskowitz v. . JenkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. City of Watertown v. RodenbaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York State Hairdressers & Cosmetologists Ass'n v. CuomoNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Tenny v. SainsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API