Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonitz Bros. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. Appeal, No. 3195 C.D. 1982Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Doyle:

I respectfully dissent. Section 306(f)(1) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 *599formerly required that the employer provide payment for ‘ ‘ transportation to and from the place where such [medical] services are rendered.” This requirement, however, was omitted by the 1939 amendment to the Act.2 In Goliat v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 254, 38 A.2d 727 (1944), the Superior Court held that the omission of this requirement “clearly indicates an intention on the part of the legislature to do away with the requirement that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. City of New Castle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Goliat v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API