In re Marriage of Goesel
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
*232 ¶ 1 At issue is whether fees that have already been earned by an attorney in a dissolution of marriage proceeding are considered "available funds," such that they may be disgorged under section 501(c-1)(3) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Act) ( 750 ILCS 5/501(c-1)(3) (West 2014)). We hold that earned fees are not subject to disgorgement.
¶ 2 BACKGROUND
¶ 3 The facts of this case are set forth fully in the appellate court's opinion. 2017 IL App (3d) 150101 , ¶¶ 3-10, 410 Ill.Dec. 797 , 71 N.E.3d 793 . We set forth here only those facts necessary to an understanding of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kunkel v. WaltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Solon v. Midwest Medical Records Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Midstate Siding and Window Co. v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2023
- Valerio v. Moore Landscapes, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
- Cassidy v. China Vitamins, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Marriage of ZamudioIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.