Legal Opinion

De Young v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 18, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill by Stockholders, to compel the restoration of misappropriated funds. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

This was a bill filed by the defendants in error, comprising the minority stockholders in the Morden Frog and Crossing Works, a corporation, against said corporation and the plaintiff in error, its former secretary and treasurer, and William J. Morden, its president.

The purpose of the bill was to compel said William J. Morden and the plaintiff in error to restore to the corporation moneys alleged to have been received by them severally by way of salaries, and by Morden alone by way of royalties and otherwise, in excess of what it was alleged they were entitled to receive, and for general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunphy v. Traveller Newspaper Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Hall v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Freeport Securities Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Alston Mfg. Co v. SquairAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API