State v. Sheehan
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
¶1 Mark Sheehan received workers’ compensation benefits after suffering a job-related injury in 2009. In 2012, the State charged Sheehan with felony theft, by common scheme, for obtaining benefits by means of deception after he allegedly misrepresented the severity of his injury to medical providers. At the close of the evidence, Sheehan moved to dismiss based on insufficient evidence. The District Court denied the motion. The District Court also rejected Sheehan’s proposed jury instruction on the termination of benefits under workers’ compensation statutes. The jury found Sheehan guilty. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KaarmaMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. ArchambaultMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. G. SpottedbearMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. J. LackmanMontana Supreme Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. T. RitesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. EllerbeeMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SuttonMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. SheehanMontana Supreme Court · 2017