Legal Opinion

Ralph Charles Kaufman and Jack Harry Edwards v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1963No. 18415_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by each of two defendants from a jury verdict holding each guilty of robbing a national bank, during which robbery the two defendants (with a third defendant, one Conner, who turned state’s evidence) are accused of assaulting and putting in jeopardy the lives of various bank employees. Defendant Edwards was accused of using “a .38 calibre revolver,” defendant Kaufman with using “a .45 calibre automatic pistol,” and defendant Conner with using “a revolver.”

Appellants’ brief is three pages in length and cites no cases. But two questions are raised:

1. Did the trial court err in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Benjamin Hemphill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. FreieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Chester White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. Harold WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API