Legal Opinion

Blue v. Leathers

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Cause heard before Marshall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtScates, J.

By consent the parties employed a third person to state their accounts and strike a balance between them; both- parties rendered their • accounts accordingly, and the balance was ascertained and announced to the parties, without exception to it by either, or any express promise to pay by Blue, against whom a balance of $87.97 was found. Before separating, they agreed'that a small item of some four or five dollars had been overlooked, and Leathers agreed to adjust it when the balance was paid.

This settlement was proven upon the trial, and at the instance of Leathers the court instructed the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. ButtlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Beaumont Rice Mills v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Rose v. BuscherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. Leeds v. TownsendAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Freeman v. GordonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API