LaFratta v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This ease came before the Court for oral argument on May 9, 2000, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and considering the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time. The plaintiffs, Ruth LaFratta (LaFratta) and Kimberly Rhodes (Rhodes) (collectively referred to as plaintiffs), appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- MacEra Bros. of Cranston, Inc. v. Gelfuso & Lachut, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- DiQuinzio v. Panciera Lease Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Lopes v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Spratt v. ForbesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Diaz v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Oliveira v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Global Waste Recycling, Inc. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Scottsdale Insurance v. United Rentals (North America), Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Andreoni v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Argelis Pichardo v. Julie StevensSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.