Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mass

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1975No. 74-45Published

1Dissent

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN,

dissenting:

The accused shall ‘he informed of the nature and cause of the accusation (U.S. Const, amend. VI) or, otherwise stated, the accused shall have the right to “demand the nature and cause of the accusation” (III. Const, art. I, § 8). These constitutional mandates have been supplemented by statute. (See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, § 111 — 3(a)(3).) Consequently, an indictment must allege the necessary elements of the offense charged. It is by this standard that the validity of an indictment is tested. When the standard is met, the natural result will bes to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. EdgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. The PEOPLE v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. DoranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API