Household Goods Carriers' Bureau v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilkey, Circuit Judge
I dissent from Part I of Judge Robb’s opinion for the Court concerning the extraordinary value rule. Section 216(b) of the Interstate Commerce Act (the “Act”) authorizes carriers to establish and enforce regulations governing the manner .and method in which shippers are to present, mark, pack and deliver property for transportation.1 Pursuant to this statutory authorization, the household goods carriers (the “Carriers”), petitioners here, adopted a regulation requiring shippers to notify carriers if certain designated items of extraordinary value, such as currency, bullion, and jewelry, are…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.