Legal Opinion
Holland v. Golden Rule Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 9, 1996No. 96-264PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
688 So.2d 1186 (1996)
Lee M. HOLLAND, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-264.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
October 9, 1996.
James Anthony Blanco, Lake Charles, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Earl Norman Vaughan, Metairie, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KNOLL, WOODARD and DECUIR, JJ.
WOODARD, Judge.
The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff, Lee Holland, Jr., in an action on an insurance policy executed between Holland and the defendant, Golden Rule Insurance Company. Golden Rule appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Defendant-appellant, Golden Rule…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Garcia v. St. Bernard Parish School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Hearty v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Lucito v. Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Foret v. LOUISIANA FARM BUR. CAS. INS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nerness v. CHRISTIAN FIDELITY LIFE INS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Haas v. Audubon Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Savarino v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mistich v. WeeksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.