Legal Opinion

Mill v. Roulliard

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Crawford District Court. — IIon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged assault and battery. The answer was a general denial and a plea of self-defense. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for. $1. Plaintiff filed a motion for new trial on various grounds. This motion was overruled and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The petition alleged that the defendant did maliciously both bite and strike the plaintiff. The defendant by his answer admitted that he did both bite and strike the plaintiff but he averred that he did the same to repel assaults on the part of the plaintiff upon the defendant and in reasonable self-defense. Fourteen grounds of reversal are laid in appellant’s brief. These grounds, however, all revolve about one or two points and are so treated in appellant’s argument and we shall follow the argument in our consideration of them.

1. Assault and battery : verdict for nominal damages: actual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SterrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. State v. ArcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Greenfield v. Unique Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Beck v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API