Legal Opinion

Richlow Mfg. Co. v. Nicholas

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 30, 1941No. Civ. No. 220PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SYMES, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a Colorado corporation, sues the defendant, Collector of Internal Revenue for Colorado, for $133.66, with interest from December 6, 1939, duly demanded by the defendant and paid by the plaintiff as an employers’ excise tax for the years 1937 and 1938. Thereafter, and on April 25, 1940, in accordance with the provisions of law, plaintiff filed its claims for refund of said employers’ excise taxes so paid for 1937 and 1938, which on August 1, 1940, were denied by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in their entirety.

The sole issue to be resolved is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Brannaman v. Richlow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Welch & BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Griswold v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Personal Finance Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API