Legal Opinion
Hanan v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2008No. 07-1203PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Babray Hanan, a citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen his immigration proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition in part and dismiss the remainder for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1980, Hanan, a member of the Pashtun ethnic group, was paroled into the United States after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. 2 In 1983, a jury convicted Hanan of importation of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960, and possession of heroin with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jose Cruz v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Tamenut v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Imad Ibrahim Mouawad v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Naing Tun v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Abdi Gelle Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Iglesias v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Li Fang Huang v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Jezierski v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Alzainati v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Larngar v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.