Legal Opinion

Weisenberger v. Harmony Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county : No. 148, to October and November Term 1867. This was an action of assumpsit, brought to April Term 1865, by Philip Weisenberger and others, trading as Weisenberger, Fisher & Co., against the Harmony Eire and Marine Insurance Company of New York, on a policy, not under seal, to recover for the loss of a quantity of oil destroyed by fire on the 2d of February, at the Keystone Oil Refinery, Pittsburg.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county : No. 148, to October and November Term 1867. This was an action of assumpsit, brought to April Term 1865, by Philip Weisenberger and others, trading as Weisenberger, Fisher & Co., against the Harmony Eire and Marine Insurance Company of New York, on a policy, not under seal, to recover for the loss of a quantity of oil destroyed by fire on the 2d of February, at the Keystone Oil Refinery, Pittsburg. On the trial the plaintiff gave in evidence the policy, dated April 18th 1864, for insurance to the amount of $4000 “ on refined oil in barrels…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, January 7th 1867, by

Thompson, C. J.

It has been often said that a policy of insurance, with its clauses, conditions and stipulations, is the law of the legal relation between the insurers and insured, by which their mutual rights and liabilities are to be understood and measured : 4 Wright 289. In this respect an insurance is like other contracts, liable to be reformed on account of accident or mistake, and set aside for fraud; so a latent ambiguity may be explained by extrinsic testimony, and terms of art, commerce of trade defined by the same process.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Downing v. Erie School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Standard Accident Insurance v. Malibu Dude Ranch, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1959
  3. Haws v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Seed Leaf Tobacco Growers Co. v. Lebanon Mutual Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API