Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Story

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1947No. A-10926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.

This petitioner, John O.'Story, has upon numerous occasions filed in this court what he designates as “habeas corpus,” “petition in error;” “mandamus”, etc. We have been very lenient in permitting the filing of these petitions, and have considered all of them.

Petitioner was convicted in the district court of Bryan county of the crime of murder. He was convicted of murdering his wife by locking her in an outbuilding and setting fire to the same. He appealed his conviction to this court, and the judgment of the district court of Bryan county was affirmed. Story v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 273, 120…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Story v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Ex Parte StoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. In Re StoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Ex Parte StoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Story v. Burford, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Ex Parte GoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Story v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API