Legal Opinion

In Re Dixon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1953No. Crim. 5171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.2d 756 (1953)

In re CHARLES AUGUSTUS DIXON, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 5171.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 15, 1953.

Franklin C. Stark, under appointment by Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

After a trial before a jury in the superior court petitioner was convicted of a violation of section 480 of the Penal Code, which prohibits the making or possessing of dies, plates or other apparatus used in counterfeiting. [fn. *] He was sentenced to San Quentin, where he is now…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (HC) Barkley v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Lambert v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Freddy Curiel v. Amy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API