Legal Opinion

Patorno v. Vacaro

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1923No. 23637PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON. J.

The purpose of this suit is to annul, on the ground of fraud, a transfer of stock made by plaintiff to defendant. The suit was dismissed on an exception of no cause of action, and from the judgment dismissing it, plaintiff has appealed.

The petition sets forth that on February 4,1918, plaintiff was one of the five stockholders of the Crescent City Ice Manufacturing Company, Incorporated; that defendant, Joseph Vacarro, was also one of them, and besides was a large creditor of the corporation. The petition then recites that—

Shortly prior .to the date mentioned, “Joseph Vacarro (the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Katz v. Krauss Co. Employees' Pension FundLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Storey v. StantonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Mossler v. Capital City Auto Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Storey v. StantonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API