Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lindsay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 1990No. 90-1481Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStone, Judge

I agree that a scoring error should be considered under rule 3.850, notwithstanding the defendant’s failure to raise the issue on direct appeal. Therefore, similarly, petitioner is entitled here to question departure reasons that the record shows were also scored. However, although it is not an issue here, I do not agree that an invalid departure reason alone, unrelated to a scoring issue, should be considered for the first time under rule 3.850. I would recede to that extent from Braddy v. State. See, e.g., Gonzalez-Osorio v. State, 535 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 544 So.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gonzalez-Osorio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Dreyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API