In re Singer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Charges preferred by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York against the respondent, that the respondent had been guilty of fraud and deceit in the proceedings by which he obtained permission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
The respondent- is charged .with fraud and deceit in the proceedings by which he was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law of the State of Hew York, in that he presented to the State Board of Law Examiners an affidavit, verified June 3, 1909, in which he stated that he had served a regular clerkship in the law offices of one Martin Zatulove, 309 and 350 Broadway, Hew York city, from June 28, 1906, to February 27,1909. This service in a law office not being sufficient to justify the respondent in being examined at the June examination, he filed another…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- In re PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942