Legal Opinion

New York Ex Rel. Abrams v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 14, 1993No. 86 CV 2345PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, Chief Judge.

I. DECISION AND PRELIMINARY COMMENT

A. Decision

This is an antitrust action brought by the New York State Attorney General’s Office against Anheuser-Busch seeking injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. § 1 and New York General Business Law §§ 340-47. The State challenges Anheuser-Busch’s vertical non-price territorial restriction agreements, known as its 1982 Equity Agreement with its authorized wholesalers, charging that they unreasonably restrained trade, thus violating the above mentioned antitrust laws. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the 1982…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller Brewing Co. v. Bartholemew County Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Park West Radiology v. Carecore National LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. United States v. American Express Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API