Legal Opinion
Weatherly v. Cochran
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 2018No. S-17-1329PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreudenberg, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Luke J. Cochran appeals the issuance of a harassment protection order and denial of a motion to vacate the ex parte harassment *871 protection order against him. During a show cause hearing, the district court stated that because Cochran appeared through counsel rather than appearing in person, the ex parte harassment protection order would be automatically extended for 1 year. However, the court proceeded to allow the petitioner, Michelle Weatherly, to testify and allowed Cochran's counsel to cross-examine Weatherly. After the hearing, the district court found that Weatherly had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SwindleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Elstun v. ElstunNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Hron v. DonlanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Farmers Co-op v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- George Clift Enters. v. Oshkosh Feedyard Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Peterson v. EbkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Interest of Jeremy U.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- City of Hastings v. SheetsNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.