Georgia Fertilizer Co. v. Privitt

This cause is before us on appeal from order dissolving an attachment in aid of foreclosure.

The contention is made on authority of the opinions in the eases of Alford vs. Leonard, et al., 88 Fla. 532, 102 Sou. 885, and Tilghman vs. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore, Maryland, 90 Fla. 282, 105 Sou. 823, in which former case it was said:

‘‘ The attachment being under the control of the Court, is not subject to attack as are Writs of Attachment at law. Proceedings for their discharge must be taken under the rules of Chancery practice. Therefore, one who wishes to have his property…