Knox v. Rivers Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
“When there is a promissory note, or other written obligation to pay money, and contemporaneously there is an oral agreement that the obligation is to be discharged by the doing of something other than the payment of money, so long as the contemporaneous, oral agreement remains ex-ecutory, it is wholly inoperative, and no defense whatever to a suit on the obligation.” Patrick v. Petty, 83 Ala. 420, 3 South. 779; Tuskaloosa C.-S. Oil Co. v. Perry, 85 Ala. 158, 167, 4 South. 635; Lakeside Co. v. Dromgoole, 89 Ala. 505, 509, 7 South. 444. See, also, Beard v. White, 1 Ala. 436; Clark v. Hart, 49…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jefferson County Savings Bank v. ComptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Tuskaloosa Cotton-Seed Oil Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Patrick v. PettySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Lake-side Land Co. v. DromgooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Corbin v. SistrunkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pasquale Food Co., Inc. v. L & H INTERNATIONAL AIR., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973