Legal Opinion

Andrews v. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 29, 2008No. A08A1695PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Geraldine Andrews, acting pro se, sued Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta, Inc., seeking to enjoin Habitat from erecting a fence on property in which she claimed to possess a prescriptive easement. The trial court granted Habitat’s motion for summary judgment, and Andrews appeals. Discerning no error, we affirm.

On appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this Court “conducts a de novo review of the evidence to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Merlino v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Hallisy v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Norton v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Azam v. RPR Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Wilkes 581 Farms, LLC v. Henry Pope McAvoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API