Legal Opinion
State v. Scow
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1942No. 6343PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, Justice.
The respondent, Neal Scow, was charged, by information, with the crime of Pandering, committe as follows, to.wit:
“That the said named defendant, Neal Scow, on or about the 15th day of August, A. D. 1941 at and within the county of Sanpete, state of Utah, did then and there convey a certain female person * * * she being the wife of the said defendant, from a point near the Town of Mayfield, to a point near that C. C. C. camp * * * for the purpose of having the said * * * commit acts of prostitution; to wit, acts of sexual intercourse for and in consideration of the payment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- People v. LockhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. McCornishUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. ColstonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1942