Legal Opinion

Chastain v. Evennou

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 26, 1964No. C 4-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision. By agreement, plaintiff was examined by a physician designated by the defendants. While an order as provided by Rule 35,1 Federal Rules of *352Civil Procedure, was not obtained from the court, it is clear that the examination was voluntarily accorded (as is customary in this district) with that rule in mind, and that, in accordance with the usual understanding, copies of reports were to be exchanged in harmony with subdivision (b) of the rule.

The plaintiff had been examined…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nedimyer v. Pennsylvania R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Kelleher v. Cohoes Trucking Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  3. Rutherford v. AlbenDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940
  4. Lipshitz v. BleyhlDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swift v. SwiftDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  2. Cheff v. American States Preferred Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
  3. Larson v. Davidson Trucking IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  4. Levy v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API