Lehoczky v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Swartwood, J.), entered May 15, 1991 in Chemung County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff Elek Lehoczky’s motion for relief from certain prior judgments and orders.

The arguments raised by plaintiffs in their pro se brief in support of the motion to vacate the judgment are essentially "newly-discovered evidence” (CPLR 5015 [a] [2]) arguments. Such evidence, however, must be material and likely to change the result if a new trial is granted and a court’s determination in this regard will be overturned only if there was an abuse of discretion (see,…