Legal Opinion

People v. Conigliaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Goldstein, J.

The primary issue before this Court is whether the crime of enterprise corruption is sufficiently pleaded in the indictment (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 600-601). The appellant focuses on two elements: whether a criminal enterprise is sufficiently alleged in the indictment and whether a pattern of conduct is properly alleged.

The indictment charges that the appellant and his codefendants (see, People v Barbone, 290 AD2d 512), are members of the “Conigliaro Gambling Organization,” that operated an unlawful sports betting and policy gambling operation in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. AbbamonteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. NappoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. VespreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Western Express International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re Devon R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. BarboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. KeschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API