Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1926No. 6 Div. 616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant in this action for damages sustained while working in a well being dug on defendant’s premises. The cause was tried before the court without a jury.

It is first insisted there was error in overruling demurrer to the complaint.

The two counts of the complaint are based upon the common-law liability of defendant to furnish to plaintiff, the employee, reasonably safe appliances. Huyck v. McNerney, 163 Ala. 244, 50 So. 926. Each count contains the expression that it was “the duty of defendant to furnish safe appliances for said Work,” rather than the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. MarbutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Huyck v. McNerneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Shaw v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Alabama Steel & Wire Co. v. TallantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Springer v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Green v. MarlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Shepherd v. Scott's ChapelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API