Legal Opinion

Clary v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1961No. Civ. No. 19008Published

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J. pro tem.*

Plaintiff seeks damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act for personal injuries received while employed as a carman in defendant’s shops at Sparks, Nevada. The verdict was for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed. He claims insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law in the refusal of certain instructions.1

He was injured while engaged in the removal of a draft gear and yoke from a drop bottom gondola ear. The gear and yoke weighed about 400 pounds and rested on a tie strap which was riveted to the center sill of the ear.2

His foreman told him to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deckert v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  2. Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Frank Fox v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API