Chinn v. First Municipality of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Rule to show fcause why a nuandámus should not he issued to the judge of the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J;
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The judge of the First District, in answer to á rulé to show cause why a mandamus should not he issued, commanding him to grant an injunction on thé petition of the First Municipality, states:
First, That the injunction, asked by the Municipality, would be a renewal of another theretofore granted and dissolved', ahd from the dissolution of which there is no appeal.
Secondly, That the allowance of the injunction was a matter in hiS discretion, which was duly exercised', and for this he refers to the record of the suit.
The rule was granted, on the affidavit of the Municipality, that shortly after…
2Cited by9 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Le BourgeoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Tarver v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Coltraro v. ChotinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Engeran v. Consolidated CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Blanck v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.