Legal Opinion · Dissent
Kent v. Lefkowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 17, 2014Published
1DissentStein, J.
We agree with the majority that respondent New York State Racing and Wagering Board (hereinafter the Board) properly raised the duty satisfaction defense in its answer in response to the improper practice charge filed by the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO (hereinafter PEF). However, we are of the view that respondent Public Employ*1213ment Relations Board (hereinafter PERB) correctly determined that the Board satisfied its obligation to negotiate wages for seasonal employees and dismissed the improper practice charge. Thus, we disagree with the majority’s conclusion to the contrary and,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Chenango Forks Central School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Town of Islip v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Professional Staff Congress-City University v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Monroe County v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011