Legal Opinion

Royston v. Eastern Empire Corporation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-512PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

This is a derivative action brought by four shareholders of Eastern Empire Corporation (“Eastern Empire”) against 32 individuals and corporate defendants. 1 In a 37 page complaint devoid of clarity and precision the plaintiffs charge the defendants with various violations of the federal securities laws, 2 as well as numerous state law claims 3 which they seek to have considered pendent 4 to the federal violations. The Complaint alleges that Eastern Empire sustained serious losses 5 as a result of the alleged illegal activity of the defendants, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clinton Hudson & Sons v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. MacMurray v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Nelson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Willis v. Dillsburg Grain & Milling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Korman Corp. v. Franklin Town Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API